总局回复：维保项目实施频次不得超出对应周期

《电梯维护保养规则》（TSG T5002-2017）规定了电梯维护保养的基本项目和要求，“半月、季度、半年、年度”维保项目实施频次不得超出对应周期。如涉嫌违反相关法律法规，可按相应法律法规处理。

电梯标准法规（ID：ELEVATOR-CODE）

编辑｜Saul Zhang

电梯季度维保记录时间差问题

问：咨询领导：1.电梯维保单位相邻两次季度维保记录和半年维保记录时间相差100天——超过3个月，是否可以直接认定为超期维保，即不按技术规范进行维保？（技术规范中明确半月保不超过15天，季度保具体时间差未明确）2.之前总局回复，如果维保单位未及时填写维保记录，但说自己维保过了，且使用单位认可去维保了，可以补记录，不处罚。那如果两个月之后，检查发现维保记录未填写，或中间差一次季度维保记录，但双方认可维保过，是否也可以补，不处罚？

答复：《电梯维护保养规则》（TSG T5002-2017）规定了电梯维护保养的基本项目和要求，“半月、季度、半年、年度”维保项目实施频次不得超出对应周期。如涉嫌违反相关法律法规，可按相应法律法规处理。

回复部门：特种设备安全监察局时间：2019-11-20

State Administration for Market Regulation: Elevator Maintenance Frequency Ought Not to Exceed Corresponding Period

Question 1: As the former and latter quarterly maintenance records have been over 100 days earlier or later than semi-annual maintenance report, which means over 3 months, is this an over-due maintenance that is violating the technical specifications? The technical specification has made it clear that two fortnight maintenance work should be performed in 15 days, however the number is not sure for a quarterly maintenance.

Question 2: As the Administration has said that if a maintenance company have performed a maintenance but not yet filled out the maintenance records, it would not be punished as long as the user admits it and the records are completed. However, if the maintenance record was missed out for over 2 months or even is not found missed out after the next maintenance is done, and the maintenance company and the user both agree to the maintenance, will the rule still apply?

Reply from State Administration for Market Regulation: As Lift Maintenance Regulation required, the frequency of elevator maintenance should not exceed corresponding period, including fortnight, quarterly, semi-annual and annual ones. If any units have violated the regulation, it should be punished in accordance with laws and regulations.